phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Jul 11 16:33:54 CEST 2006
In message <ujrbqrwnrt4.fsf at cat.linpro.no>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgra
>The only worry I have is that another five-day test workshop will eat
>up most of my remaining time (this is not a matter of work capacity,
>but of the number of contracted hours)
Yes, I'm wondering about the wisdom of this considering how well
our first live test went.
With respect to stability and performance we are where I expected
to be after live test 2, with respect to features we are not.
But testing features is not even close to a good use of a live test.
Here is an alternative and slightly more agrresive plan:
Mid July (phk and/or des)
Ad-Hoc supervised low-volume production at VGNETT
Anders need to set the Alteon to a very low setting,
but otherwise his involvement is not required.
Late July (phk, anders & des)
Coordinated supervised high-volume production at VGNETT
Same formula as last time, only I stay in Denmark and
we restrict to one day.
Unsupervised low-volume production at VGETT
Unsupervised high-volume production at VGETT
Anders makes the call on this one.
(This would push the NUUG talk into September as well)
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-misc