Problem with varnish and caching
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
rudd-o at rudd-o.com
Tue Jul 3 18:30:23 CEST 2007
On lun, 2007-07-02 at 22:42 -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2007, at 7:26, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
> > I never insulted any of you.
> You really should go see a therapist. Just tell him or her: "People
> think I'm a rude idiot - please help me."
I will convey your thoughts to my therapist. We'll probably laugh about
it over a bottle (or two) of scotch.
> In your weblog post you called Dag-Erling and Poul-Henning "thin-
> skinned". Rather than disagree (although I do) with that I'll
> contest the assumption that having "thick skin" should be a
> prerequisite for building or participating in an open source community.
Yes, having a thick skin is a prerequisite for participating in a
community where everyone can actually *talk* to you and *reach* you.
Being thick-skinned means:
- not taking criticism of your product PERSONALLY
- conceding that others may have a point, however wrong their arguments
appear to be
Under that definition, neither Dag-Erling, nor Poul-Henning have a thick
> To be on-topic: I agree with the current conservative, RFC compliant
> default behavior. (Or to be more accurate: it was caching just fine
> for my use-case, too).
Well, then Varnish is a perfect fit for you. It wasn't for me, and (I
spent some time reading Varnish's varnish-misc mailing list) I
discovered others had experienced the same problem.
> - ask
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o at rudd-o.com>
The R Zone - http://rudd-o.com/
GPG key ID 0xC8D28B92 at http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
Now playing, courtesy of Amarok:
Never reveal your best argument.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the varnish-misc