Strange Problem with Port 80

[Per Andreas Buer]

Hi,

You could try and make a tcpdump of a slow session. "tcpdump -n -w
varnish.pcap -e "host $PROXYHOST" might show you what is going on. If
you have no success let me have a look.

Per.

Yu, Ryan wrote:
> That could be true.  I believe we are actually using Surf Control.
>
> Would it be likely that this proxy would not affect Squid, yet would affect Varnish?
>
> I ask, merely because Squid appears to be working properly.
>
> And I'd much rather use Varnish than Squid at this point and would like to find a solution or at least an explanation so I can do some other testing from a non-proxied location.
>
> --
> Cordially,
>  
> Ryan Yu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav [mailto:des at linpro.no] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 6:04 AM
> To: Yu, Ryan
> Cc: varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
> Subject: Re: Strange Problem with Port 80
>
> "Yu, Ryan" <ryu at hfmus.com> writes:
>   
>> I'm having the strangest problem.  I'm using varnish on some test
>> servers and it works great when I run it on any random port number that
>> is NOT port 80.
>>     
>
> My guess is that there is some sort of content-scanning transparent
> proxy between you and the server.
>
> DES
>   


-- 
Per Andreas Buer / Linpro AS   t: 21 54 41 21 / m: 958 39 117                   
http://linpro.no/ - Ledende på Linux og åpen kildekode.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20070509/9e7d003a/attachment-0002.pgp>