sendfile() and Varnish2.0.2
plfgoa at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 11:10:07 CET 2008
Can you please shed some light on the mail that I had sent regarding
varnish performance ? In the same mail I have attached a mrtg graph
of CPU utilisation which is very spiky.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> In message <75cf5800812030153h762711f3q1ff2b31819970d70 at mail.gmail.com>, "Paras
> Fadte" writes:
>>Thanks for the response. So "thread_pools" parameter should be
>>increased or the "thread_pool_max" or both should be increased ?
>>Currently I have "thread_pools" as 4 and "thread_pool_max" as 750
> You should only increase thread_pools if you have performance
> problems due to lock-contention.
> You should only increas thread_pool_max if you regularly have
> bursts of dropped sessions.
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-misc