Default behaviour with regards to Cache-Control

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <loom.20090211T115351-267 at post.gmane.org>, Ole Laursen writes:

>Why doesn't Varnish respect Cache-Control: private and Cache-Control: no-cache
>out of the box?

Because we see those as headers you want non-friendly caches to act on,
whereas we consider Varnish a friendly cache, under your control.

Poul-Henning

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.