Problems with ACL and some prefixes

[Stig Sandbeck Mathisen]

"Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" <svein-listmail at stillbilde.net>
writes:

> On 18.08.2010 11:31, Liaan vd Merewe wrote:
>> According to strict IP rules, you not allowed to supernet a
>> 192.168.0.0 range(its class C range).. so /22 on 192.168.0.0 is
>> prohibited.
>> 
>> I don't know if that is the cause of your problem, can you maybe test
>> on a 10.x.x.x range?
>
> How long ago was the conversion to classless IP again?

The CIDR RFC dates 1993.  :)

However, the VCL compiler does not complain.  If the newest varnish
still acts up on that CIDR, I will hazard a guess that it's not caused
by excessive and unwarranted nostalgia.

-- 
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20100818/3aee7220/attachment-0003.pgp>