varnish 2.1.4 swap and increase in objects:heads.
Anders Nordby
anders at fupp.net
Sun Oct 31 01:22:42 CEST 2010
Hi,
No. I had issues with having a too large storage size, and havn't tried
increasing it since.
But Varnish with -s malloc in FreeBSD does seem to run OK with 60 GB
storage size and having 51 GB in the swap on disk at one of our sites. I
have 32 GB of physical RAM.
Regads,
Anders.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:19:50PM +0200, Taylan Develioglu wrote:
> More of a general question:
>
> Is there anyone that uses varnish with a storage size of 800GB+ (single
> instance, file or malloc) ?
>
> I'm just wondering because we've had so much problems with varnish
> (2.1.2 to 2.1.4) that I'm starting to think that we're an edge case.
>
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 14:26 +0200, Per Buer wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > The issues are actually a bit different. One uses "-s file" which
> > really makes the kernel handle the memory management implicitly in
> > comparison to you Rodrigo, which uses -s malloc, where you clearly
> > state that Varnish should allocate this much memory.
> >
> > Regarding -s malloc we recommend that on Linux one should not use more
> > then 75% of the physical memory for -s malloc. In addition to the
> > actual object store Varnish uses quite some memory for it's internal
> > data structures. If you go above 75% chances are that Linux will start
> > swapping a bit which might have a negative effect on overall
> > performance. Tollef is getting back to you outside the list regarding
> > the issue you've raised with us.
> >
> > Per.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Rodrigo Benzaquen
> > <rodrigo at mercadolibre.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Taylan, exactly the same is happening to us, we already open a ticket
> > > with Varnish software.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you find a solution.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Rodrigo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------
> > >
> > > Rodrigo Benzaquen
> > > @rbenzaquen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: "Taylan Develioglu" <tdevelioglu at ebuddy.com>
> > > To: varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> > > Sent: Viernes, 29 de Octubre 2010 8:37:21
> > > Subject: varnish 2.1.4 swap and increase in objects:heads.
> > >
> > > Debian Lenny, Linux varnish0 2.6.33.7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 2 15:27:53 CEST
> > > 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > I have a strange situation on one of our varnish servers.
> > >
> > > We recently raised the expiry on previously uncached content a
> > > (Cache-Control: max-age=0, to Cache-Control: max-age=5).
> > >
> > > The number of objects vs. heads increased and the system started
> > > swapping (vm.swappiness=0).
> > >
> > > http://lcontent.ebuddy.com/varnish/memory-week.png
> > > http://lcontent.ebuddy.com/varnish/varnish_objects-week.png
> > > http://lcontent.ebuddy.com/varnish/varnish_expunge-week.png
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't understand why this is happening, bug maybe ?
> > >
> > > DAEMON_OPTS="-a :27535 \
> > > -T localhost:6082 \
> > > -f /etc/varnish/default.vcl \
> > > -s file,/var/cache/varnish/sda/varnish_storage.bin,135G \
> > > -s file,/var/cache/varnish/sdb/varnish_storage.bin,135G \
> > > -s file,/var/cache/varnish/sdc/varnish_storage.bin,135G \
> > > -s file,/var/cache/varnish/sdd/varnish_storage.bin,135G \
> > > -s file,/var/cache/varnish/sde/varnish_storage.bin,135G \
> > > -s file,/var/cache/varnish/sdf/varnish_storage.bin,135G \
> > > -p thread_pools=4 \
> > > -p thread_pool_min=200 \
> > > -p thread_pool_max=2400 \
> > > -p thread_pool_add_delay=2 \
> > > -p lru_interval=20"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---vcl---
> > > sub vcl_recv {
> > > unset req.http.cookie;
> > > unset req.http.Authorization;
> > >
> > > if (req.http.host ~ "^.*host.domain.com.*") {
> > > set req.http.host = "host.domain.com";
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (req.request == "HEAD") {
> > > return(pass);
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (req.request == "PURGE") {
> > > if (!client.ip ~ purge) {
> > > error 405 "Not allowed.";
> > > }
> > > return(lookup);
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (req.request == "GET" && req.url == "/monitor") {
> > > error 200 "OK.";
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (req.backend.healthy) {
> > > set req.grace = 30s;
> > > } else {
> > > set req.grace = 48h;
> > > }
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > sub vcl_fetch {
> > > if (beresp.status == 404 || beresp.status >= 300) {
> > > return (pass);
> > > }
> > > set beresp.grace = 48h;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > sub vcl_hit {
> > > if (req.request == "PURGE") {
> > > set obj.ttl = 0s;
> > > error 200 "Purged.";
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > sub vcl_miss {
> > > if (req.request == "PURGE") {
> > > error 404 "Not in cache.";
> > > }
> > > }
> > > ---EOF---
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > varnish-misc mailing list
> > > varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> > > http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > varnish-misc mailing list
> > > varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> > > http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
--
Anders.
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list