Understanding persistent storage

Jean-Francois Laurens jean-francois.laurens at rts.ch
Tue Apr 19 09:04:42 CEST 2011


I guess you mean it¹s present in the options but not working correctly now
for production use ?


Le 19/04/11 08:53, « Traian Bratucu » a écrit :

> There is no persistent cache in varnish. At least, not yet.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: varnish-misc-bounces at varnish-cache.org
> [mailto:varnish-misc-bounces at varnish-cache.org] On Behalf Of Yang Zhang
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 2:47 AM
> To: varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> Subject: Re: Understanding persistent storage
> 
> Hi, we're reconsidering using Varnish again, and this question I posted 4
> months ago is the biggest blocker for us.  We've been using Squid for a while,
> but it doesn't have collapsed forwarding, which we need (and Varnish
> provides).  But we also need a persistent cache.
> We're ready to roll our own caching proxy, but if Varnish already provides
> persistence, then that would be a huge boon.  We tried playing around with
> Varnish -s persistent 4 months ago but it didn't seem to be what the name
> implied.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
> 
> Jean-Francois Laurens
> Ingénieur Système Unix
> Resources et Développement
> Secteur Backend
> RTS - Radio Télévision Suisse
> Quai Ernest-Ansermet 20
> Case postale 234 
> CH - 1211 Genève 8
> T +41 (0)58 236 81 63
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20110419/98a10be2/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the varnish-misc mailing list