no caching of large object

AD straightflush at gmail.com
Mon Aug 15 13:02:20 CEST 2011


So does that mean the same recipe holds for 3.0 just with the improvement
that the restart does not cause a second fetch ? Or is there a better recipe
now for piping large files ?

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Tollef Fog Heen <
tfheen at varnish-software.com> wrote:

> ]] "Lukas, Christian (extern)"
>
> | we like to avoid large objects to be cached.
> | I found the configuration below on
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.varnish.misc/4741 .
> | If I got it right the object will be fetched from the backend twice.
>
> It depends on your Varnish version.  In newer versions, it won't be
> fetched twice.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Tollef Fog Heen
> Varnish Software
> t: +47 21 98 92 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20110815/ff39aa1a/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the varnish-misc mailing list