How to set up varnish not be a single point of failure

[Pablo Garcia Melga]

Sounds good to me, check if you LB has the ability to persists to the same
cache based on the URL, that would prevent duplicate objects.

Regards, Pablo

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Siju George <sgeorge.ml at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I understand that varnish does not support cache peering like Squid.
> My planned set up is something like
>
>
>           ---- Webserver1 ---              ------- Cache ---
> ------ API
> LB ----|                          |---- LB----|                    |---- LB
> ----|
>           ---- Webserver2 ---              ------- Cache ---
> ------ API
>
> So if I am using Varnish as Cache what is the best way to configure them so
> that there is redundancy and the setup can continue even if one Cache fails?
>
> Thanks
>
> --Siju
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20110128/b55d96ce/attachment-0003.html>