lurker?

[Per Buer]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Lars Jørgensen <lajo at kb.dk> wrote:

> > What was known as purges in Varnish 2.x is known as bans in 3.0, so a
> > bit of confusion...
>
> Is that really the case? According to the documentation, both concepts
> still exists. As I understand them, a ban is a permanent filter, a purge is
> a deletion of cache object(s).
>

No. Bans are not permanent. They are *lazy*. They are applied at a later
time, when the relevant object is requested. If the object is *newer* than
the ban the band doesn't apply.

-- 
Per Buer, CEO
Phone: +47 21 98 92 61 / Mobile: +47 958 39 117 / Skype: per.buer
*Varnish makes websites fly!*
Whitepapers <http://www.varnish-software.com/whitepapers> |
Video<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7t2Sp174eI> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/varnishsoftware>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20110630/b3960bb0/attachment-0003.html>