Upgrading 2.0.5 to 3.0.0

[Jim Hayter]

Looking at the values reported by varnishstat, I think I want SMA.s0.nobj
and SMA.s0.nbytes.  Would someone please confirm this?

Jim

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jim Hayter <jim.hayter at gmail.com> wrote:

> With 2.0.5 I was monitoring/graphing the values from "varnishstat -1 -f
> uptime,cache_hit,client_req,n_lru_nuked,sma_nobj,sma_nbytes".  I am using
> memory cache.  It is not clear to me what values in 3.0.0 correspond to
> sma_nobj and sma_nbytes.  I'd appreciate some clarification.
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20120402/0f3f3559/attachment.html>