SPDY in Varnish ?
anders at fupp.net
Tue Mar 20 22:04:19 CET 2012
FWIW, Firefox 11 includes SPDY support:
OTOH, it'll make debugging HTTP more difficult? ;-/
On lør, apr 30, 2011 at 09:06:52am +0200, Per Buer wrote:
> We've discussed SPDY several times. SPDY is interesting but it would be
> premature to implement it this early. SPDY isn't even an official IETF draft
> yet and Google is still experimenting with it. I think, for us to consider
> implementing it, we would need at least two things to happen. 1) An IETF
> standard and 2) browser adoption. Even then it might not make sense. The
> earlier drafts of SPDY weren't very proxy friendly. I'm not familiar with
> Googles infrastructure but they might not use generic web proxies in their
> web applications so it wasn't relevant for them.
> Until then I think it's better to sit tight and se who wins. HTTP-MPLEX,
> Waka and SCTP are other technologies that operate in the same problem space.
> We have no idea who might win.
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Simon Lyall <simon at darkmere.gen.nz> wrote:
> > Just wondering what the varnish devs thoughts are on the SPDY protocol 
> > and it's likelihood of going into varnish alongside http?
> >  http://www.chromium.org/spdy
> > --
> > Simon Lyall | Very Busy | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/
> > "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT.
> > _______________________________________________
> > varnish-misc mailing list
> > varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> > http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
> Per Buer, CEO
> Phone: +47 21 98 92 61 / Mobile: +47 958 39 117 / Skype: per.buer
> *Varnish makes websites fly!*
> Whitepapers <http://www.varnish-software.com/whitepapers> |
> Video<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7t2Sp174eI> |
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/varnishsoftware>
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
More information about the varnish-misc