memory vs disk cache for large media files

[Zeeshan Ali Shah]

With a very basic bench mark i go this info -- seems good what do you think
?

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.49881 s, 307 MB/s


Zeeshan

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Jean-Christian BEDIER <jc.bedier at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Could you confirm that your VPS has acceptable delay to access to
> local disk storage ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Le 18 nov. 2012 à 19:55, Zeeshan Ali Shah <zeeshan at infoshield.info> a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> > I need suggestion for media cdn using varnish .
> >
> > Our design is to use VPS on different areas  and install varnish for cdn
> type media delivery .
> >
> > Since most of the VPS has less memory around 512 MB but good disk size
> like 10 GB , i am thinking to use Disk for cache instead of RAM .
> >
> >
> > Any suggestion ?
> >
> > BR
> >
> > Zeeshan
> > _______________________________________________
> > varnish-misc mailing list
> > varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20121119/d9c19493/attachment.html>