I wrote a post about one of the ways we are using varnish at TheLadders

[Dridi Boukelmoune]

One last question then, why do you expect PATCH requests ?

(I know I'm curious =)


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Sean Allen <sean at monkeysnatchbanana.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune
> <dridi.boukelmoune at zenika.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is very interesting and didactic, and I have a few questions :
>>
>> Why not simply trust the backend?
>> if (beresp.http.x-invalidates && beresp.status >= 200 && beresp.status <
>> 400) {
>>   ban("obj.http.x-url ~ " + beresp.http.x-invalidates);
>> }
>>
>
> Completeness I suppose. I see your point.
> Something to think about.
>
>>
>> I don't see any handling of the PATCH method in vcl_recv, check it doesn't
>> end up being piped:
>> if (req.request != "GET" &&
>>   req.request != "HEAD" &&
>>   req.request != "PUT" &&
>>   req.request != "POST" &&
>>   req.request != "TRACE" &&
>>   req.request != "OPTIONS" &&
>>   req.request != "DELETE") {
>>     /* Non-RFC2616 or CONNECT which is weird. */
>>     return (pipe);
>> }
>
>
> We don't have any clients that use PATCH. But that is a good point, I should
> add just to be safe.
>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Dridi
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Sean Allen <sean at monkeysnatchbanana.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hopefully, some find it helpful.
>> >
>> > I'm still fairly new to varnish. Improvements, suggestions etc welcomed.
>> >
>> > http://dev.theladders.com/2013/05/varnish-in-five-acts/
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Ce n'est pas une signature
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > varnish-misc mailing list
>> > varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
>> > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ce n'est pas une signature