varnish reduces hit rate

[Joydeep Bakshi]

can we do something to improve ?


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Guillaume Quintard <
guillaume.quintard at smartjog.com> wrote:

>  On 04/23/2014 10:30 AM, Joydeep Bakshi wrote:
>
> sorry but I failed to understand "same storage space".  Even I have not
> done any such configuration tewak.
>
>  Though I like to share first few lines of  varnishstat which shows the
> poor cache_hit
>
>  0+00:57:24
> Hitrate ratio:        2        2        2
> Hitrate avg:     0.0149   0.0149   0.0149
>
>         35062         0.00        10.18 client_conn - Client connections
> accepted
>        35062         0.00        10.18 client_req - Client requests
> received
>            2         0.00         0.00 cache_hit - Cache hits
>        34994         0.00        10.16 cache_hitpass - Cache hits for pass
>           66         0.00         0.02 cache_miss - Cache misses
>        34975         0.00        10.16 backend_conn - Backend conn. success
>
>   You have a high hitpass ratio, your backend may not be sending TTL/Age
> information, causing varnish to avoid caching.
>
> -- Guillaume Quintard
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20140423/0720a4b0/attachment.html>