Threads in 4.0
numard at gmail.com
Tue May 20 00:39:33 CEST 2014
Interesting... Doe the site say the persistent store is
deprecated/unmaintained? That explains the periodic crashes I get.. ( I'll
resuscitate the ticket i had created some months anyway...)
On 19/05/2014 5:12 pm, "Per Buer" <perbu at varnish-software.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen <apj at mutt.dk>wrote:
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 09:24:18PM +0100, James Harrison wrote:
>> > >
>> > Good to know. There's more than just that one bug, though - just had
>> > an hourlong site outage due to varnish's child just up and dying and
>> > not being restarted. Wouldn't know where to look for debug output -
>> > restarted the parent and it worked again for about 3 minutes and then
>> > the child didn't die but it did stop servicing requests. New requests
>> > would be accepted, and held open, but nothing happened subsequently.
>> > Just downgraded to 3.0 and everything's working again. Persistent
>> > storage is a nice-to-have to avoid cold caches after restarts/crashes,
>> > but 4.0 clearly needs some work before it goes anywhere near production.
>> It sounds like you've upgraded to get persistent? Persistent is still
>> experimental, just as it was in 3.0.
> Experimental is misleading, it makes it sound like the code has a future.
> I think the persistence code is still there because nobody has bothered
> disabling it yet.
> There is no work being done on the persistent. I doubt someone will pick
> it up.
> <http://www.varnish-software.com/> *Per Buer*
> CTO | Varnish Software
> Phone: +47 958 39 117 | Skype: per.buer
> We Make Websites Fly!
> Winner of the Red Herring Top 100 Global Award 2013
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the varnish-misc