Why varnish caches as the cache is stopped?

[Guillaume Quintard]

Why wouldn't it be cached? Sorry but I'm not getting the problem here.

-- 
Guillaume Quintard

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:56 PM, georgi.int at gmail.com <georgi.int at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes, but the result were cached and can't understand why. While it's
> cached on port 80 where the varnish is, opening the page with :8080 was ok
> (on the apache side). Any other suggestions?
>
>
> On 12/14/2015 07:04 PM, Guillaume Quintard wrote:
>
>> Server: Apache
>> >    16 TxHeader     c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
>> >    16 TxHeader     c Content-Length: 0
>> >    16 TxHeader     c Accept-Ranges: by
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20151215/aa59c460/attachment.html>