varnish consumes more and more memory
Jason Price
japrice at gmail.com
Mon Apr 18 15:19:13 CEST 2016
Ignore the vsz column. It is effectively worthless as a measure.
That RSS however... if that grows to more than 150% of the 4G number, then
you might have to look at your config more closely.
Why 150%? because there's overhead for each cached object (around 1k per)
and there's other stuff which impacts things as well.
-Jason
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Tobias Eichelbrönner <
tobias.eichelbroenner at lamp-solutions.de> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> thanks for the reply.
>
> > ps -eo pid,user,vsz,rss,%cpu,%mem,cmd | egrep ...
>
> nobody 7284032 3590708 5.2 5.4 /usr/sbin/varnishd -P
> /var/run/varnishd.pid -a :80 -T localhost:6082 -f
> /etc/varnish/default.vcl -S /etc/varnish/secret -s
> file,/var/lib/varnish/varnish_storage.bin,4G
>
> The stats shown here are lower than reported in my last mail as I had to
> restart varnish since than. But 8 GB of virtual RAM also seem to be to
> high for a system with 4GB file storage and does not match anything I
> see in varnishtat output.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Tobias
>
> --
> LAMP solutions GmbH
> Gostenhofer Hauptstrasse 35
> 90443 Nuernberg
>
> Amtsgericht Nuernberg: HRB 22366
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Heiko Schubert
>
> Es gelten unsere allgemeinen Geschaeftsbedingungen.
> http://www.lamp-solutions.de/agb/
>
> Telefon : 0911 / 376 516 0
> Fax : 0911 / 376 516 11
> E-Mail : support at lamp-solutions.de
> Web : www.lamp-solutions.de
> Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/LAMPsolutions
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/#!/lampsolutions
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20160418/28bdef9b/attachment.html>
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list