Varnish segfault inserting leap second
Yiannis Karayiannidis
yianniska at gmail.com
Mon Jan 2 13:48:00 CET 2017
Hi Poul,
the messages i've got were
Dec 31 23:59:59 lin-varnish kernel: Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60
UTC
and
Jan 1 00:00:02 lin-varnish ntpd[951]: 0.0.0.0 061b 0b leap_event
I'm not sure how the CentOS handled leapsecond...
Regards
Yiannis
2017-01-01 13:02 GMT+02:00 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk>:
> --------
> In message <CAMbCpVq4KFEkfbYjVEqEhaJB+PbZWmdv04-z8w2PpvnXkfazCQ@
> mail.gmail.com>, Yiannis Karayi
> annidis writes:
>
> >Dec 31 23:59:59 lin-varnish kernel: Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60
> >UTC
> >Dec 31 23:59:59 lin-varnish systemd: Time has been changed
> >Dec 31 23:59:59 lin-varnish kernel: varnishd[18512]: segfault at 0 ip
> >0000000000433829 sp 00007fd7c7d1e170 error 4 in varnishd[400000+95000]
>
> Do you know how this particular system handled leapseconds ?
>
> (ie: did it step the clock, did it use the ntp_adjtime(STA_INS) or dit it
> slew it ?)
>
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20170102/21d75304/attachment.html>
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list