Varnish and max-age=0

Girouard, Yanick Yanick.Girouard at stm.info
Thu Jul 20 20:16:53 CEST 2017


Interesting… Following your response, I've tested setting beresp.ttl in a simplified version of our VCL and it's caching the request even with max-age=0… So that means something else is causing this in my VCL. I will try to debug it further and see if I can find it.

Thanks!

De : Reza Naghibi [mailto:reza at varnish-software.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 20 juillet 2017 14:06
À : Girouard, Yanick <Yanick.Girouard at stm.info>
Cc : varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
Objet : Re: Varnish and max-age=0

Can you provide the varnishlog for a request which isnt getting cached?

--
Reza Naghibi
Varnish Software

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Girouard, Yanick <Yanick.Girouard at stm.info<mailto:Yanick.Girouard at stm.info>> wrote:
Hi Reza,

Yes we are. Here's the default we apply. Those two subs are called in order in vcl_backend_response:

/* REMOVE CACHE-CONTROL AND SURROGATE-CONTROL FROM BACKEND *
***********************************************************/
sub stm_backend_resp_unset_cache_control_headers {
                unset beresp.http.Surrogate-Control;
                unset beresp.http.Cache-Control;
                unset beresp.http.Expires;
}

/* DEFAULT ALL TO: TTL 30MIN + GRACE 15MIN *
*******************************************/
sub stm_backend_resp_expiration_default {
                set beresp.ttl = 30m;
                set beresp.grace = 15m;
}

That doesn't seem to have any impact when the backend responds with a Cache-Control: max-age=0 header.

Any idea?


De : Reza Naghibi [mailto:reza at varnish-software.com<mailto:reza at varnish-software.com>]
Envoyé : jeudi 20 juillet 2017 13:58
À : Girouard, Yanick <Yanick.Girouard at stm.info<mailto:Yanick.Girouard at stm.info>>
Cc : varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org<mailto:varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org>
Objet : Re: Varnish and max-age=0

The TTL is calculated before entering vcl_backend_response. So eventhough you unset the Cache-Control header, the value of TTL will be calculated based on it. Are you setting a new value for beresp.ttl? You need to do that:

sub vcl_backend_response
{
  unset beresp.http.Cache-Control;
  set beresp.ttl = 120s;
}

--
Reza Naghibi
Varnish Software

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Girouard, Yanick <Yanick.Girouard at stm.info<mailto:Yanick.Girouard at stm.info>> wrote:
Hi,

We use Varnish to cache for multiple backends and need Varnish to always control what is cached despite what backends could respond. In other words, even if a backend sets Cache-Control headers to never cache its pages, we still want Varnish to cache them based on defined rules (i.e. certain URL patterns or hosts have different TTLs).

We have recently realized that one of our backend always set the following header: Cache-Control: max-age=0, private, must-revalidate

Our VCL unsets the Cache-Control header in vcl_backend_response and sets its own before delivering. By unsetting the Cache-Control header in vcl_backend_response I would expect Varnish to ignore the max-age=0 value and still cache the page as per our other rules, but it seems that the second it sees max-age=0 in the response header, that it makrs the object as not cacheable.

Other than by changing the backend's response to never set max-age=0, is there a way to force Varnish to cach pages even if it returned max-age=0?

Is this even by design or is it a bug?

Thanks,
Yanick Girouard


_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org<mailto:varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org>
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20170720/4ce5e74f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the varnish-misc mailing list