Softpurge and nearly immediate refresh?

Guillaume Quintard guillaume at varnish-software.com
Thu Apr 12 09:25:47 UTC 2018


bereq.is_bgfetch?

-- 
Guillaume Quintard

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, 09:24 Danila Vershinin <ciapnz at gmail.com> wrote:

> Couldn’t really find anything useful besides obj.hits which indirectly
> tells us it’s a background fetch. So:
>
> sub vcl_deliver {
>    if (req.http.grace == "normal(limited)" && *obj.hits == 0* &&
> req.http.Varied-Header = 'value1') {
>      set req.http.Varied-Header = 'value2’;
>      unset req.http.grace;
>      return (restart);
>    }
> }
>
> ? :)
>
> Best Regards,
> Danila
>
> On 12 Apr 2018, at 00:24, Guillaume Quintard <
> guillaume at varnish-software.com> wrote:
>
> There's a beresp attribute for that last one (I'm on mobile, so I'm going
> to point you to man vcl :-))
>
> --
> Guillaume Quintard
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 22:39 Danila Vershinin <ciapnz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So I guess I’m looking into having one background fetch trigger another
>> background fetch (to sequentially refresh different object variants). In
>> this fashion:
>>
>> 1. Client PURGE request will do softpurge.softpurge(); return(restart);
>> with GET method, etc. which will all lead to "return deliver()" in limited
>> grace logic to fire background fetch .
>>
>> 2. Then in background fetch:
>>    → in its vcl_deliver() - the current object variation has already
>> entered cache, so setting varied header to value2, removing grace limited
>> flag and calling restart(). This way it should continue revalidation for
>> the other object variant
>>    → we land inside limited grace logic again (as it’s a different object
>> variant) and return deliver() again thus firing off second background fetch
>> (which will refresh second object variant).
>>
>> So the standard grace logic + something like this:
>>
>> sub vcl_deliver {
>>    if (req.http.grace == "normal(limited)" && req.http.Varied-Header =
>> 'value1') {
>>      set req.http.Varied-Header = 'value2’;
>>      unset req.http.grace;
>>      return (restart);
>>    }
>> }
>>
>> However, it won’t work at least because req.http.grace flag will be set
>> for both the background fetch and the request that kicked it off. (it will
>> be there in vcl_deliver of both).
>> Question is how can we tell if we are inside background fetch?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Danila
>>
>> On 11 Apr 2018, at 12:37, Guillaume Quintard <
>> guillaume at varnish-software.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> That's indeed correct, a purge will kill all variations, and the restart
>> only fetches one.
>>
>> The req.hash_always_miss trick however only kills/revalidate one
>> variation.
>>
>> At this moment, we have no way to purge/revalidate all the object under
>> one hash key.
>>
>> --
>> Guillaume Quintard
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Danila Vershinin <ciapnz at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guillaume,
>>>
>>> A bit puzzled on something. If we use Vary: by some header.. am I
>>> correct that we need multiple restarts to refresh each object variation?
>>>
>>> Since the background fetch would only refresh the variation that matched
>>> initial purge request.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 9 Apr 2018, at 12:18, Guillaume Quintard <
>>> guillaume at varnish-software.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You can purge then set the method to GET then restart. Would that work
>>> for you?
>>>
>>> Other way is to use req.hash_always_miss that will only revalidate if we
>>> are able to fetch a new object.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Guillaume Quintard
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Danila Vershinin <ciapnz at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> What I work with:
>>>>
>>>> * Grace mode configured to be 60 seconds when backend is healthy
>>>> * Using softpurge module to adjust TTL to 0 upon PURGE.
>>>>
>>>> The whole idea is increasing chances that visitors will get cached page
>>>> after cache was PURGEd for a page.
>>>>
>>>> Standard piece:
>>>>
>>>> sub vcl_hit {
>>>>     if (obj.ttl >= 0s) {
>>>>         # normal hit
>>>>         return (deliver);
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>>     if (std.healthy(req.backend_hint)) {
>>>>         # Backend is healthy. Limit age to 60s.
>>>>         if (obj.ttl + 60s > 0s) {
>>>>             set req.http.grace = "normal(limited)";
>>>>             return (deliver);
>>>>         } else {
>>>>             return(fetch);
>>>>         }
>>>>     } else {
>>>>         # ...
>>>>     }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> And use of softpurge:
>>>>
>>>> sub vcl_miss {
>>>>     if (req.method == "PURGE") {
>>>>         softpurge.softpurge();
>>>>         return (synth(200, "Successful softpurge"));
>>>>     }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> sub vcl_hit {
>>>>     if (req.method == "PURGE") {
>>>>         softpurge.softpurge();
>>>>         return (synth(200, "Successful softpurge"));
>>>>     }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Current behaviour:
>>>>
>>>> * send PURGE for cached page
>>>> * Visitor goes to the page within 60 seconds and sees a stale cached
>>>> page (triggering background refresh)
>>>> * Further visits to the page will show refreshed page
>>>>
>>>> What I’m looking for:
>>>>
>>>> Trigger the background refresh right after PURGE while still leveraging
>>>> grace mode :) That is, serve stale cache for only as long as it takes to
>>>> actually generate the new page, and not wait for 60 seconds:
>>>>
>>>> * upon PURGE: set TTL to 0 (softpurge) + trigger background page
>>>> request (possible?)
>>>> * serve stale cache only while the page is generated
>>>>
>>>> I could have adjusted the “healthy backend grace period” to lower than
>>>> 60s, but I’m basically checking to see if it’s possible to refresh “nearly”
>>>> immediately in this kind of setup.
>>>>
>>>> Hope I made any sense :)
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Danila
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> varnish-misc mailing list
>>>> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
>>>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20180412/71912da7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the varnish-misc mailing list