<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#333333">
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Hi all,<br>
<br>
For an emergency, I just setup a varnish 2 over Solaris 10 on a
Sparc IIIi.<br>
1°) Taking v 2.1.5 was a fail as the varnish parent process didnt
want to start<br>
2°) Looking arround the Web, I saw that two versions of Varnish
were available for Sparc (I mean packaged by some other
system/distributions): 2.1.3 and 2.0.4<br>
a - 2.1.3 parent launched, but couldn't connect to the background
Apache<br>
b - 2.0.4 gave me satisfaction as it compiles, runs and connects
to the backend.<br>
<br>
My application configuration is:<br>
- 1 front varnish on 0.0.0.0:80, configured to connect to 1 Apache
located on the same machine listening on 127.0.0.1:8080<br>
** Varnish is _for the moment_ default configured and the VCL is
about one section declaring the backend<br>
- Application is a Drupal 7 one<br>
- The database is on another machine.<br>
<br>
The hardware is: Sun v440, with 1 Sparc IIIi CPU and 8GB RAM<br>
<br>
Now, the question is:<br>
Has someone experienced varnish 2.0.4 with Solaris10 on Sparc, and
what about the reliability of that mix? (I ask because Sparc doesnt
seem to be the prior target for support, as stated in
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/ticket/1177">https://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/ticket/1177</a> and
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://goo.gl/MxZqb">http://goo.gl/MxZqb</a>)<br>
<br>
Thank you for your answers.<br>
</font>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
RMA.</pre>
</body>
</html>