<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>> From: reader_1000@hotmail.com
> Hi,
>
> First, I am making requests to page which Varnish caches and CPU usage of Varnish is around 17% on average:
>
> Second, I am making requests to page which Varnish passes to the backend since it is a static page and I cannot purge it timely when it changes therefore I prefer Varnish not to cache it. However, for this scenario CPU usage of Varnish is around 78% on average:
>
> It seemed a little bit strange to since I directly pass the request to the backend without any additonal processing. Could you please help me to find the reason? Where should I look for: operating system, backend, Varnish parameters?
Hi,
Has anyone experienced a similar issue? Is it related to tcp connection establishment cost? What is the recommended keepalive value for backend which resides on the same machine with Varnish?
Thanks. </div></body>
</html>