<div dir="ltr">thank you.  with that referenced, varnish compiled.<div><br></div><div>Thank you.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:phk@phk.freebsd.dk" target="_blank">phk@phk.freebsd.dk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">--------<br>
In message <<a href="mailto:CAFZdCuqR_izyYgv_wxs5YoBgcySUbM9ASXxm7raYGUyPZJ9vwA@mail.gmail.com">CAFZdCuqR_izyYgv_<wbr>wxs5YoBgcySUbM9ASXxm7raYGUyPZJ<wbr>9vwA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
, Alex Evonosky writes:<br>
<br>
>Error:<br>
>FAILED to set maximum for param critbit_cooloff: 254.000<br>
>Must be less than or equal to 254.000<br>
><br>
>FAILED to set maximum for param vsm_free_cooldown: 600.000<br>
>Must be less than or equal to 600.000<br>
<span class=""><br>
>Has anyone seen this before?<br>
<br>
</span>Yes.  This is an incredibly silly floating-point rounding issue<br>
caused by a questionable decision Intel made back in 1977 :-/<br>
<br>
See:<br>
<br>
        <a href="https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/issues/1875#issuecomment-204020993" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/<wbr>varnishcache/varnish-cache/<wbr>issues/1875#issuecomment-<wbr>204020993</a><br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20<br>
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956<br>
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe<br>
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>