varnish 3 - thread_pools

[Per Buer]

That is correct. We haven't been able to see any increase in performance
when the number of pools is increased above 2.


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Rangel, Raul <Raul.Rangel at disney.com> wrote:

> I think someone recently commented that 2 thread pools is the ideal value.
> Anymore and you don’t see a performance increase.****
>
> ** **
>
> Raul****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* varnish-misc-bounces at varnish-cache.org [mailto:
> varnish-misc-bounces at varnish-cache.org] *On Behalf Of *lnsano at bol.com.br
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 06, 2013 2:23 PM
> *To:* varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> *Subject:* varnish 3 - thread_pools****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi,****
>
>  ****
>
> By the book, the thread_pools should be 2. However the server is
> multi-processed(8 cpus) and can handle more thread_pools.****
>
> This server handles more than 5000 requests/sec. ****
>
>  ****
>
> Is it a good ideia increasing the thread_pools to 8 and decreasing the
> thread_pool_max?****
>
>  ****
>
> regards,****
>
>  ****
>
> Leandro Sano****
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>



-- 
 <http://www.varnish-software.com/> *Per Buer*
CEO | Varnish Software AS
Phone: +47 958 39 117 | Skype: per.buer
We Make Websites Fly!

Winner of the Red Herring Top 100 Europe Award 2013
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20130502/9c357f72/attachment.html>