[Varnish] #1534: is groff really required for varnish 4+ ?

Varnish varnish-bugs at varnish-cache.org
Tue Jul 15 14:00:27 CEST 2014

#1534: is groff really required for varnish 4+ ?
 Reporter:  g.gerritsen  |       Owner:  lkarsten
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  low          |   Milestone:
Component:  build        |     Version:  trunk
 Severity:  trivial      |  Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:               |
Changes (by lkarsten):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed


 You're right, of course.

 I've removed groff-base (debs) and groff (redhat) from the list of
 dependencies in master now.

 (commits: 1f198039f07b5057cfbb23eeedb72c1c5ddf6caa in varnish-cache-
 debian.git, 5f0194694d9cec5b7dfb045abe8b2e7df3e748c7 in varnish-

 Closing the ticket.

Ticket URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/ticket/1534#comment:2>
Varnish <https://varnish-cache.org/>
The Varnish HTTP Accelerator

More information about the varnish-bugs mailing list