[master] 8c2ed01 Propagate the VCL syntax to VRT_CTX.

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

--------
In message <CABoVN9CWEPhPGHbbzj5ygsZ7D6g+fgVBORUzpmEhUPj_PJH7MA at mail.gmail.com>
, Dridi Boukelmoune writes:

>Can we avoid vocabulary overloading here? I know that on the C side we
>refer to subs as methods (and maybe we should change that) but in the
>documentation we call them subroutines.

Uhm, thinking more about it:

so if "sub vcl_recv {}" is a subroutine, what is "sub foobar {}"
and how do we explain that "sub vcl_foobar{}" is not OK ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.