[master] d6d341609 Revert "actually, the scope must not change either"
Dridi Boukelmoune
dridi at varni.sh
Mon May 27 07:18:18 UTC 2019
Hi Nils,
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 4:00 PM Nils Goroll <nils.goroll at uplex.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Dridi,
>
> thank you for looking after this.
You should also thank Martin without whom I would have remained on the
wrong track probably until today's bugwash.
> I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to give PRIV_TOP its own tree head
> rather than an additional id to put into a shared tree?
I have no opinion (but I understand the rationale) so I will leave
this question to the rest of the team.
Dridi
More information about the varnish-commit
mailing list