[master] d6d341609 Revert "actually, the scope must not change either"

Dridi Boukelmoune dridi at varni.sh
Mon May 27 07:18:18 UTC 2019

Hi Nils,

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 4:00 PM Nils Goroll <nils.goroll at uplex.de> wrote:
> Hi Dridi,
> thank you for looking after this.

You should also thank Martin without whom I would have remained on the
wrong track probably until today's bugwash.

> I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to give PRIV_TOP its own tree head
> rather than an additional id to put into a shared tree?

I have no opinion (but I understand the rationale) so I will leave
this question to the rest of the team.


More information about the varnish-commit mailing list