[master] d6d341609 Revert "actually, the scope must not change either"

Nils Goroll nils.goroll at uplex.de
Mon May 27 08:22:30 UTC 2019

> You should also thank Martin without whom I would have remained on the
> wrong track probably until today's bugwash.

Thank you, Martin! And I apologize for my bug.

>> I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to give PRIV_TOP its own tree head
>> rather than an additional id to put into a shared tree?
> I have no opinion (but I understand the rationale) so I will leave
> this question to the rest of the team.

Using a different head would use less memory, be more CPU efficient and also, I
think, result in simpler code. So a clear cut case in my opinion.



** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung

Scheffelstraße 32
22301 Hamburg

tel +49 40 28805731
mob +49 170 2723133
fax +49 40 42949753



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-commit/attachments/20190527/2196a2e5/attachment.bin>

More information about the varnish-commit mailing list