phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Sep 25 20:09:13 CEST 2006
In message <451819FA.1060802 at litespeedtech.com>, "xing at litespeedtech.com" write
>It appears it's missing a condition where varnish need to rewrite/append
>to the x-forwarded-for header if it already exists in the incoming http
>request instead of outputting a new/duplicate header.
According to RFC2616 multiple headers append, they don't replace
X-Forewarded-for: 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3
should have the same semantic meaning.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-dev