" n_smf_large so large" -- varnish-dev Digest, Vol 28, Issue 1

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <7ab169e90807102139n5253a54du4e3f8ef54f69cfb2 at mail.gmail.com>, "chen
 xiaoyong" writes:

>
>I found that there are reasons for this phenomenon because it is negative.
>Not just n_smf_large, including n_smf_frag have this phenomenon too.
>
> Perhaps some code of  storage_file.c should be some more stringent

This is a know problem, and basically we decided that perfect
statistics were not as important as fast speed.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.