behaviour when client drops the connection?
Rogério Schneider
stockrt at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 05:05:08 CEST 2009
Stuart, I think 60 minutes is too much time even for Varnish to wait.
In default configuration Varnish would wait only for, if I remember, 60
seconds and then give up on that request.
This can be tuned with -p params, like "first_byte_timeout". You can read
more here:
http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/browser/trunk/varnish-cache/bin/varnishd/mgt_param.c
Best Regards,
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:11 PM, stuart yeates <stuart.yeates at vuw.ac.nz>wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm looking to use varnish in front of an XSLT/PostgreSQL/Tomcat/Java
> site and have a question about varnish's behaviour when a client drops a
> connection.
>
> The problem is that there are a relatively small number of pages which
> are _very_ slow to generate (>60 minutes) and a large number that are
> relatively fast. Clients tend to abort the slow pages, so (using our
> current reverse proxy) they never make it into the cache.
>
> Ideally I'd like to make varnish continue the request and cache the
> result. Is that possible?
>
> Is there a way to make these slow-to-generate pages have a much longer
> cache-time?
>
> cheers
> stuart
>
> --
> Stuart Yeates
> http://www.nzetc.org/ New Zealand Electronic Text Centre
> http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/ Institutional Repository
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
> http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
--
Rogério Schneider
MSN: stockrt at hotmail.com
GTalk: stockrt at gmail.com
TerraVoip: stockrt
Skype: stockrt
http://stockrt.github.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20090902/945c0b6c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the varnish-dev
mailing list