rtstatus backend counters.
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Thu Jul 9 16:48:30 CEST 2015
In message <CAL6a+5iEu96C8s5248uKCDwJFtDvKwJSzyG7M3kM59J7CMJd4Q at mail.gmail.com>
, Arianna Aondio writes:
>>>Now, I think having function 1 as part of std_vmod is a good idea,
>>I don't think this belongs in std_vmod, it is a well defined
>>specialised type of functionality and that naturally belongs in
>>its own vmod I think.
>With "own vmod" do you mean a vmod that can be part of the main
>distribution or a vmod that doesn't live in Varnish at all?
A vmod separate from vmod_std.
And it can be part of the varnish dist if we decide it is
sufficiently popular/useful/quality etc. etc.
>>If somebody feels adventurous it could be a candidate for
>>vmod implemented VDP-based synthetic object generator.
>I'm sorry,but I don't really understand this statement.
>I don't get how involving VDP could simplify or improve such a vmod.
I didn't say it would simplify or improve the vmod.
The main benefit would be that you wouldn't have to
buffer the output, but could produce it incrementally.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-dev