[PATCH] Add a flag to mark 304 backend response processing (aka, Backend IMS/INM)
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Mar 10 21:53:16 CET 2015
In message <54F9DFA7.3050006 at schokola.de>, Nils Goroll writes:
>This is a compromise discussed at VDD15Q1 after a previous suggestion
>to expose the 304 response status directly to VCL.
I think the name looks ugly-ish, but I can't decide if I think there is
value in explicitly mentioning 304 vs. more clarity in a more descriptive
name (beresp.was_refreshed, beresp.refreshed ...)
Other than that, it looks OK.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-dev