[PATCH] Add a flag to mark 304 backend response processing (aka, Backend IMS/INM)

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

--------
In message <54F9DFA7.3050006 at schokola.de>, Nils Goroll writes:

>This is a compromise discussed at VDD15Q1 after a previous suggestion
>to expose the 304 response status directly to VCL.


>+	('beresp.is_304',

I think the name looks ugly-ish, but I can't decide if I think there is
value in explicitly mentioning 304 vs. more clarity in a more descriptive
name (beresp.was_refreshed, beresp.refreshed ...)

Other than that, it looks OK.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.