hit-for-pass vs. hit-for-miss
slink at schokola.de
Thu Sep 8 10:47:32 CEST 2016
>> On 07/09/16 23:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> I'm all for improving stuff in general, and any ideas/patches are
>> what's your opinion about the suggestion to add obj.uncacheable + return
>> miss/pass in vcl_hit (see vcl mock in my initial email).
> It doesn't "feel" quite right
What exactly doesn't?
> it certainly does not seem like
> something which is so obviously correct that I feel comfortable
> slamming it in a week before a major release...
This is nothing personal, but the change to hfm with no fallback to the previous
logic doesn't seem so obviously correct that I feel comfortable having a major
release with it.
More information about the varnish-dev