[master] cbe8047 Reintroduce hit-for-pass with new and better syntax:

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

--------
In message <CABoVN9C3z2X38q9yd0RF1DTaq0ybhPg+rZ967G3KS5M_=MCxzQ at mail.gmail.com>, Dridi Boukelmoune writes:

>We need to clear the confusion of turning hitpass into a hitmiss in
>5.0, while keeping the MAIN.cache_hitpass counter as is. Especially
>now that hitpass lives alongside hitmiss.

Yes, there are a number of consequences that we need to attend to.

>Also, should the built-in VCL make a distinction between hitmiss and
>hitpass?

IMO built-in VCL should never use hit-for-pass.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.