[master] cbe8047 Reintroduce hit-for-pass with new and better syntax:
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Wed Feb 22 14:19:50 CET 2017
In message <CABoVN9C3z2X38q9yd0RF1DTaq0ybhPg+rZ967G3KS5M_=MCxzQ at mail.gmail.com>, Dridi Boukelmoune writes:
>We need to clear the confusion of turning hitpass into a hitmiss in
>5.0, while keeping the MAIN.cache_hitpass counter as is. Especially
>now that hitpass lives alongside hitmiss.
Yes, there are a number of consequences that we need to attend to.
>Also, should the built-in VCL make a distinction between hitmiss and
IMO built-in VCL should never use hit-for-pass.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-dev