[RFC] Changes to pass mode
des at linpro.no
Wed Feb 7 11:54:34 CET 2007
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
> Does this make sense ?
1) I've had trouble with PASS vs. PIPE in the past which have led me
to conclude that PASS as it is today is not very useful.
There is one downside to PIPE: we can't insert a header telling the
backend that we're acting on behalf of a client, which makes
logging difficult. We *can* do so with PASS, though I believe we
2) The current backend code is fragile, and the separate code paths
make debugging it difficult; as I understand your proposal, the
backend code will become more unified, which will help improve
robustness and error handling and facilitate debugging.
> Any better ideas ?
Not off the top of my head...
> Does anybody even read this mail-list anymore ? :-)
Senior Software Developer
Linpro AS - www.linpro.no
More information about the varnish-misc