[RFC] Changes to pass mode

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <ujrfy9igrv9.fsf at cat.linpro.no>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgra
v?= writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> writes:

>   There is one downside to PIPE: we can't insert a header telling the
>   backend that we're acting on behalf of a client, which makes
>   logging difficult.  We *can* do so with PASS, though I believe we
>   currently don't.

Well, it should be (will be) possible to do that in vcl_recv{} but
it may make sense to have a vcl_pipe{} for that job, to avoid
repetitions in vcl_recv{}.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.