cache empties itself?

Michael S. Fischer michael at
Thu Apr 3 20:04:57 CEST 2008

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Sascha Ottolski <ottolski at> wrote:
>  and I don't wan't upstream caches or browsers to cache that long, only
>  varnish, so setting headers doesn't seem to fit.

Why not?  Just curious.   If it's truly cachable content, it seems as
though it would make sense (both for your performance and your
bandwidth outlays) to let browsers cache.


More information about the varnish-misc mailing list