Cacheability - changed in Varnish 2?

[Anton Stonor]

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> As far as I can tell, a zero TTL (number after "RFC") can only
> happen here if your default_ttl parameter is set to zero, OR
> if there is clock-skew between the varnish machine and the
> backend machine.

Right on!

Backend is running on the same box as Varnish for this test. But: you 
are right about default TTL being 0.

After setting default TTL to 60, everything runs smooth. So this issue 
was not about Varnish versions, but different default TTL configs.

Thanks alot.

/Anton