Cacheability - changed in Varnish 2?

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <49817D5C.10807 at giraffen.dk>, Anton Stonor writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> As far as I can tell, a zero TTL (number after "RFC") can only
>> happen here if your default_ttl parameter is set to zero, OR
>> if there is clock-skew between the varnish machine and the
>> backend machine.
>
>Right on!
>
>Backend is running on the same box as Varnish for this test. But: you 
>are right about default TTL being 0.

I hope we don't ship varnish that way on any platforms, the default
ttl should be 120 seconds...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.