Varnish computes Content-Length and set it to 0 for one of my URL!

[zabrane Mikael]

Hi Michael,

I'm verry happy that the bug was fixed:
http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/733

Is there a Varnish's git/svn repository somewhere with the fix?

Thanks guys ;-)

-- 
Regards
Zabrane

2010/8/8 Michael Alger <varnish at mm.quex.org>:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:43:03PM +0200, zabrane Mikael wrote:
>>
>> As I wrote it before, accessing our backend directly with "curl"
>> or any web browser worked for us for years now. Here's an example:
>>
>> $  curl -0 -D -  -v -I --no-keepalive --proxy 127.0.0.1:7676 http://www.groupama.fr/
>> Date  Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:18:29 GMT
>> Content-Type  text/html; charset=UTF-8
>> X-Powered-By  ASP.NET
>> Set-Cookie    jsessionid=MXFJmqLZ2cwnR1gyFhVDvzG59zx2KcP2vKcg6lNP4Gnz5nVky4D1!1556069365;
>> path=/
>> [...]
>>
>>> It seems like Varnish is only adding the erroneous header when it is
>>> using your "caching backend", yes? (i.e. the thing on port 7676)
>>
>> Yep, only with our backend.
>>
>>> Would capturing the traffic Varnish sees with tcpdump and comparing
>>> the two (squid and the caching backend) be feasible?
>>
>> with wireshark, it's my first time using it (please, see enclosed files).
>
> Sorry, I was more interested in the actual data of the response.
> Presumably Varnish is interpreting the response from squid
> differently to the response from the caching backend.
>
> Or, is there a way for us to see the response from the backend? Is
> the site http://www.groupama.fr/ currently served by the caching
> backend, i.e. if I point a Varnish at it I should see the same bug?
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>