obj.cacheable vs expires headers?
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Wed Feb 10 11:11:55 CET 2010
In message <15261481.301265709947078.JavaMail.luc at syntop>, lstroobant at gmail.com
>I'm not sure we're still talking about the same problem. :-)
>Just to be sure: we don't want to cache that dynamic page, but I'm
>wondering why (with those) headers, it's still seen as obj.cacheable
As I said, the cacheability is a different decision from how long
time to cache.
The logic of the code is in the sourcefile "rfc2616.c", try to walk
your request through it by hand...
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-misc