obj.cacheable vs expires headers?

lstroobant at gmail.com lstroobant at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 11:05:50 CET 2010

----- "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:

> >     9 RxHeader     b Expires: Sun, 19 Nov 1978 05:00:00 GMT
> This is your problem: the backend says that the object is already
> expired, so obviously we cannot cache it for any amount of time.

I'm not sure we're still talking about the same problem. :-)
Just to be sure: we don't want to cache that dynamic page, but I'm wondering why (with those) headers, it's still seen as obj.cacheable by Varnish. If you check the log of the second request in my previous mail, you even see a message "   8 VCL_call     c hit" which seems to suggest the object is served from cache?
(cache-control: max-age = 900 is also set)


More information about the varnish-misc mailing list