Bug fix 601 - Will be in the next release?

John Norman john at 7fff.com
Thu Jan 28 04:54:06 CET 2010

Yes, but the workarounds seem to replace x-forwarded-for with another
header, e.g., X-Real-Forwarded-For

And the FAQ entry
seems to assume that there is nothing fronting Varnish that has
already added an x-forwarded-for header (which is what the bug is

In any case, I assume that the fix for bug 601 will go into the next
release . . .

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:42 PM, pablort <pablort+varnish at gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you tried google "varnish x-forwarded-for" ?
> There an FAQ entry addressing that (somewhat).
> []'s
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:47 PM, John Norman <john at 7fff.com> wrote:
>> Folks,
>> Will the fix for http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/601 (cf.
>> http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/540) be in the next release?
>> My Varnish gets a x-forwarded-for from another server: What will the
>> VCL be to use that instead of whatever Varnish tries to append?
>> John
>> _______________________________________________
>> varnish-misc mailing list
>> varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
>> http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

More information about the varnish-misc mailing list