Swapping & High Load
dridi.boukelmoune at zenika.com
Wed Mar 20 13:35:53 CET 2013
Doesn't worker threads also use memory for both their call stacks and
I believe this is not part of the storage, as well as the "naked" memory
footprint of varnishd.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Sean Allen <sean at monkeysnatchbanana.com>wrote:
> I'm seeing something higher like 5k per.
> 6g malloc.
> 600k objects cached right now
> varnish has 9.7 gigs of memory resident
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Per Buer <perbu at varnish-software.com>wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Sean Allen <sean at monkeysnatchbanana.com>wrote:
>>> Does Varnish need additional memory beyond what is allocated via malloc?
>> Yes. Malloc is only the backend storage. In addition there are a few data
>> structures that are global. If I recall correctly the overhead is more or
>> less 1k per object.
>> <http://www.varnish-software.com/> *Per Buer*
>> CEO | Varnish Software AS
>> Phone: +47 958 39 117 | Skype: per.buer
>> We Make Websites Fly!
> Ce n'est pas une signature
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the varnish-misc