Varnish + Tomcat vs Apache + mod_cache + mod_jk +Tomcat

Adrian Ber beradrian at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 16 13:06:24 CEST 2013


Definitely VCL is easier to use than Apache config. And Varnish/Apache and Tomcat will be sitting on the same (cloud) machine.
Then practically I would be interested in a comparison of the overhead added by Apache vs Varnish in terms of non-cached requests.

Thanks,
Adrian.




On Wednesday, 16 October 2013, 11:54, Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi.boukelmoune at zenika.com> wrote:
 
Hi,
>
>I have no data to show, but since I use all three tools, I can give
>you my two cents :)
>
>Varnish + Tomcat is definitely the simplest architecture, because it
>does not involve AJP. I would also consider changing the default
>(blocking) http connector on the Tomcat side and measuring performance
>improvements (non blocking, native...). I'm also a big fan of the VCL
>which feels a lot more natural than httpd's configuration to me.
>
>As I trust Varnish not to be the bottleneck, I am not keen on adding a
>new indirection (httpd) for a binary protocol that is not relevant to
>me anymore. I believe (still no data) having a 10Gb/s connection
>between Varnish and Tomcat (I
 assume they're not sitting too far from
>each other) outperforms the compactness of AJP (serialization
>involved).
>
>Best Regards,
>Dridi
>
>
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Adrian Ber <beradrian at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Does anyone have some comparison data in terms of performance for using in
>> front of Tomcat either Varnish or Apache with mod_jk. I know that AJ
>> connector suppose to be faster than HTTP, but I was thinking that in
>> combination Varnish which is lighter and highly optimized could perform
>> better. There is also the discussion between static resources (which I think
>> will perform
 faster with Varnish than Apache, even with mod_cache) and
>> dynamic pages.
>> I asked this question on ServerFault too
>> http://serverfault.com/questions/545793/varnish-tomcat-vs-apache-mod-jk-tomcat
>> Which configuration would be advisable Varnish + Tomcat or Apache +
>> mod_cache + mod_jk +Tomcat?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian Ber.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> varnish-misc mailing list
>> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20131016/f9fa98c6/attachment.html>


More information about the varnish-misc mailing list