varnish overhead when only passing to backend without caching

[Albert Tollkuçi]

Varnish is very very fast. That being said, it depends on how many hits
your sites are getting. If they are less than a few hundred thousands per
day, you should not worry about Varnish overhead. Albert

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Admin Beckspaced <admin at beckspaced.com>
wrote:

> hello again,
>
> my current setup is varnish 5 in front of apache web server with 30
> different domains / websites
> in my vlc i can switch between sites and decide to do varnish caching or
> just passing to the backend with out caching.
>
> what's the overhead / delay with varnish when i just pass everything to
> the backend and back to the client without varnish doing any caching?
>
> i mean there must be some overhead as varnish is in between ...
> ... but how big is it? time delay?
>
> does anyone here have any experience with this?
>
> thanks & greetings
> becki
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>



-- 
Web: http://www.tollkuci.com
Follow me on: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/alberttollkuci> Google+
<https://plus.google.com/+AlbertTollku%C3%A7i/posts> Facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/albert.tollkuci> Twitter
<https://twitter.com/AlbertTollkuci> Career 2.0
<http://careers.stackoverflow.com/atollkuci>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20161029/2c9c7311/attachment.html>