varnishadm exit code 200

[Guillaume Quintard]

200 means the command passed to varnish, via varnishadm, succeeded. What
makes you think it failed?

On Sat, Oct 2, 2021, 15:24 Martynas Jusevičius <martynas at atomgraph.com>
wrote:

> Actually it does not seem to be the exit code. I tried checking and it
> looks like the exit code is 0:
>
> root at dc17c642d39a:/etc/varnish# varnishadm "ban req.url ~ /"
> 200
>
> root at dc17c642d39a:/etc/varnish# test $? -eq 0 || echo "Error"
> root at dc17c642d39a:/etc/varnish#
>
> So where is that "200" coming from?
>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 12:14 AM Martynas Jusevičius
> <martynas at atomgraph.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We recently switched to the varnish:latest container and based an
> > unprivileged image on it (entrypoint runs as USER varnish):
> > https://github.com/AtomGraph/varnish/blob/official-image/Dockerfile
> >
> > We noticed that our varnishadm commands started failing. More
> specifically:
> >
> > root at dc17c642d39a:/etc/varnish# varnishadm "ban req.url ~ /"
> > 200
> >
> > As I understand it's a 200 exit code, which means varnishadm failed:
> > https://varnish-cache.org/docs/5.1/reference/varnishadm.html#exit-status
> >
> > What does 200 mean exactly? I couldn't find any code list.
> > My guess is that this has to do with the unprivileged varnish user,
> > but I'm not sure what it takes to fix it.
> >
> >
> > Martynas
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20211002/f4877842/attachment.html>